A Spanking Hard Question
For this sociological analysis paper when I use the terms corporal punishment or spanking, I am using them as one and same. Now we must define these ideas and to do so I am going to use Elizabeth Gershoff’s definition of corporal punishment: “Corporal punishment is the use of physical force with the intention of causing a child to experience pain but not injury for the purposes of correction or control of the child’s behavior” This sets the context in which the question is asked. Should parents be for or against spanking/ corporal punishment? What got me started on this assignment was an article I had read a little while back which caught my eye. Its headline reads “Spanking can cause long-term harm” with the sub-heading “Study: Risks outweigh any benefit of instant obedience.” After reading through the report it immediately came to mind that corporal punishment was a social norm in its own right but not so clear and cut about how widely accepted it was. Then I thought about the points brought up and how I could apply them to my own life and experiences. Basically, the article is a brief report about a certain Elizabeth Gershoff who has recently taken it upon herself to undertake a large-scale meta-ana
When discipline gets to the point where the adult is almost aroused or gets a buzz off of punishing their child to the point where it becomes abusive then this is where I agree with Ms. Gershoff, because children are sponges. I can see George Herbert Mead stepping forth and presenting his “Stages of the Self” model, saying we have to be very careful what we say and especially what we do around the wee ones. This is the period where we must instill our values in the children which is very important, for they carry on our legacy. Our kids will grow up to be like us, so if we beat them they will most likely be damaged by it, and beat our grandkids, unless they take their rage out on our old crippled bodies first. lysis of 88 studies spanning throughout 62 years of research. Throughout her research, which was published in the July issue of Psychological Bulletin she states that she had Even though Ms. Gershoff is not a big fan of spanking children, she does admit that just because a child is spanked, it doesn’t mean that the child will grow up with psychological damage. “Not all children who are spanked will have these negative outcomes,” she says. “Most of us are evidence of that. Most of us were spanked and we’re fine.” I myself have not had the pleasure of reading all of Ms. Gershoff’s research, though I do think that I can come to this conclusion. In a report published by the Nation Council on Family Relations, in a study of 998 mothers with children between the ages of 2and 14, 67% report using some form of corporal punishment on their children. Just for the sake of argument let’s use
Some topics in this essay:
Psychological Bulletin,
Elizabeth Gershoff’s,
Ms Gershoff’s,
Holy Crap,
Ms Gershoff,
Herbert Mead,
Family Relations,
Elizabeth Gershoff,
,
corporal punishment,
psychological damage,
doing bad stuff,
bad stuff,
doing bad,
eleven negative adverse,
majority children,
spanked child,
children spanked,
ms gershoff,
eleven negative,
ms gershoff’s research,
negative adverse psychological,
adverse psychological damage,
ms gershoff’s,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1104
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on A Spanking Hard Question Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|