Taking a stance on affirmative action, or even trying to accurately define it is similar to declaring a religion. As many people have very strong views for and against affirmative action, it is a touchy subject. Affirmative action analyses determine whether employment practices result in a diverse applicant pool. Throughout the history of the United States of America the intense and controversial view of "equality" has been a hot topic. With that in mind, our founding fathers of this great country set forth the three theories of what every citizen should be entitled to; freedom, order and equality. Their perception of what equality meant has taken on many different definitions as we as a society have evolved and changed. Affirmative action is defined as a tool to monitor the consequences of employment practices, and makes no real contribution to equality or racial acceptance in America.
In 1964 after this term was coined, the Civil Rights Act increased the authority of af
are those who support the system, but use race as a privilege. The participants in this debate have over examined the ethical and moral issues that affirmative action raises while forgetting to scrutinize the system that has created the need for them. All too often, affirmative action is looked upon as the cure for the virulent disease of racial discrimination. The program works as it should by allowing for groups of a greater equality of opportunity to further advance themselves by bypassing inequalities that impede their overall effectiveness. Affirmative action is a temporary, partial, and flawed remedy for past and continuing discrimination against historically marginalized and disenfranchised groups in American society. Certainly the debate over affirmative action raises some basic questions about how people are selected for positions and promotions. However, affirmative action is not justified in merely qualifying someone for a position based on the color of their skin. This
Example Essays Home
