Affirmative Action As Racial Discrimination
Affirmative Action as Racial DiscriminationThe controversy over affirmative action is growing to embody most all selective decisions in American society. From public protection to college admissions, people are becoming resentful of such affirmative action programs. The applicability of these programs in today\'s American society has been challenged by people ranging from the everyday \"Joe\", who is finding reverse discrimination in the workplace, to college applicants, who are finding that it takes more than good grades to get admitted, to the Supreme Court, who is finding that some college admissions policies are unconstitutional and promote diversity through unfair means. In California, for example, Gov. Pete Wilson has already pushed an initiative ending affirmative action practices in colleges and universities. The initiative passed, after a 10-hour meeting, through The California Board of Reagents with a 10-15 vote. in Michigan, the state legislature is conducting hearings on the \"fairness\" of affirmative action. David Jaye, a Republican member of the Michigan State legislature, said affirmative action creates economic imbalances within the system. Affirmative action policies are means for reverse discrimination agai
When this Civil Rights Act was passed, its spirit was not one of reverse discrimination but of getting employers to consider applicants objectively in filling jobs within their companies. Hubert Humphrey, a major sponsor of the Act, swore that he would eat the bill if it were ever used for discrimination of any sort. The past cannot be changed and we should stop compensating people who were never hurt at the expense of people who have done them no harm. In California, the issue of affirmative action is one of the most controversial. Asian students at the University of California\'s Berkley campus were felt to be over-represented due to their outstanding academic performance and were actually placed at a disadvantage under certain affirmative action programs (Bresler). In Los Angeles County, affirmative action goals were raised for Hispanics, who, as a result of immigration, have become almost 40% of the county, and lowered for blacks who represent 12% of the population and have 30% of the county jobs (Bresler). Due to this inequality of representation, new tensions have risen between the two groups. Another instance where affirmative action was implemented without good reason occurred in the town of Piscataway Township, NJ (\"A Blow to\"). In this case, the Board of Education needed to lay off one teacher from the high school business faculty. The choice was narrowed down to Debra Williams, a black woman, or Sharon Taxman, who is white. Both teachers had begun working on the same day in 1980 and were considered equal in ability. The two were also judged equal with respect to work performance, certification, evaluations, teaching ability and volunteerism (\"A Blow to\"). Colleges and universities frequently also have quotas for how many blacks it is necessary to admit to \"round out\" their freshman classes. An example is the admission practices at Berkeley. Only 40 per cent of the entering class in 1988 were selected solely on the basis of academic merit. While whites or Asian-Americans need at least a 3.7 grade point average in high school to be considered for admission, most minority candidates who meet a lower fluctuating standard are automatically admitted (Shea). Berkeley continues this practice of preferential admissions for minorities even though the graduation rate of minorities is very low. Expectedly, 66 per cent of whites or Asian-Americans graduate, while only 27 per cent of black students graduate (Shea). Affirmative action has had its greatest amount of success in city, state, and federal government jobs. Slowly, the minority employment levels in these jobs began to generally mirror the relative minority population. Since the 1960s the area of law enforcement witnessed the greatest increase in minority applicants, and in jobs offered to minorities. This should be viewed as an extremely positive thing, because prior to affirmative action these jobs were almost completely closed off to minorities and woman. The influx has been greatest in the area of government, state and city, because this type of work is easier for affirmative action to watch over and regulate. Affirmative action has experienced considerably less success in integration in big business, such as General Motors, RJR Nabisco, and Microsoft. This is do to the fact that big business\' often employ entire towns or regions so the minority employee percentage is generally representative the town\'s minority population. This is why big business has been more resistant to affirmative action and harder to regulate (Ryan 37).
Some topics in this essay:
Fourteenth Amendment,
White House,
Nabisco Microsoft,
Affirmative Action,
University Michigan,
Arbor Gratz,
Brown Affirmative,
Rights Act,
Bresler Due,
Racial Discrimination,
affirmative action,
reverse discrimination,
blow to,
a blow to,
a blow,
discrimination getting,
affirmative action policies,
action policies,
equal opportunity,
civil rights act,
university michigan,
suffered discrimination,
admissions policy,
affirmative action programs,
suffered discrimination getting,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2731
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Affirmative Action As Racial Discrimination Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|