Pointing to order isn't enough because order does not logically imply design - although that is just what so many theists using this argument seem to assume.

There cannot be design without a designer; contrivance without a contriver; order without choice; arrangement without anything capable of arranging; subservience and relation to a purpose without that which could intend a purpose; means suitable to an end, and executing their office in accomplishing that end without ever having been contemplated or the means accommodated to it. Arrangement, disposition of parts, subservience of means to an end, relation of instruments to a use imply the presence of intelligence and mind.

ted from a writing in his book Natural Theology:

Conversely is it is difficult to provide an understandable explanation of the Design Argument because of its primary weakness: it relies heavily upon personal, subjective interpretation. When looking at aspects of nature, some people r

Some topics in this essay:
Argument Design, Watch Argument, Natural Theology, Design Argument, Argument Unfortunately, Teleological Argument, argument design, William Paley, design argument, design purpose, god nature uniform, nature uniform god, god nature, designed purpose, teleological argument, purpose design, uniform god, nature uniform, evidence god,