The command style according Martens is when the make all of the decisions and the athletes have no inputs. (Martens) With this style the theory is made that the coach has knowledge and experience, it is to the coach role to tell the athlete what to do. The athlete’s role in the command style is to listen, to absorb and to comply with the coach’s directions. It’s proven that the command style can be very effective if winning is the primary goal and its authoritarian nature does not contain the athlete’s motivation. (Martens) Coaches that use this style are not letting the athletes enjoying themselves and give them room for error. In today’s world, the command style is not being used as much by coaches. Young and inexperience coaches uses the command style of coaching because back when were younger athletes, they remember there coaches using the command style of coach

Some topics in this essay:
Bloomington Knight, Coach Joyner, Successful Coaching, Martens Martens, James Cuthbertson, Eddie Robinson, Martens Coaches, Bobby Knight, Gilbert Gilbert, style coaching, Winning Ugly, command style, cooperative style, style coach, submissive style, submissive style coaching, democratic style, coaching style, tennis coach, example coach, school tennis, command style coaching, cooperative style coach, style coaching cooperative, example coach cooperative,