The Value of Community-Based Instruction for Students with Mental Retardation

Community-based instruction is “teaching a skill to a student in the actual environment as opposed to teaching the skill in a classroom with the expectation of transference, generalization, and application of knowledge when skill use is required” (Beirne-Smith, Ittenbach, & Patton, 2002). The five major areas of community-referenced curriculum are work, leisure and play, consumer, education and rehabilitation, and transportation.

Normalization is “the process of providing for, and to the maximum extent possible, treating an individual with special needs in the mainstream of society as if the individual has no special needs” (Beirne-Smith et al ., 2002). According to Beck, Broers, Hogue, Shipstead, and Knowlton (1994) normalization stresses environments and circumstances that are as culturally normal as possible to enhance behaviors that are culturally normal as possible. An example would be teaching the skills needed for daily living in the community. Practicing skills in the environment in which the skills are to be used gives the students with mental r

Some topics in this essay:
Mental Retardation, According Beirne-Smith, Frances Broome, Shipstead Knowlton, Ittenbach Patton, Universite Laval, Broome April, Retardation Community-based, According Beck, mental retardation, community-based instruction, students mental retardation, students mental, et al, students severe mental, special education, severe mental retardation, severe mental, students severe, education students, , learning opportunities community, learning opportunities, student mental retardation, beirne-smith et,