Death Penalty
It is more reasonable to utilize the death penalty than to abolish it. The death penalty should not be abolished because (1) it deters people from committing murder and (2) because the death penalty gives peace of mind to the victims and their families and puts an end to the crime. (1) The death penalty should not be abolished because the fear of the highest form of punishment will keep potential victims alive. (2) The death penalty should not be abolished because the families of the victims can only begin the healing process once the murderer is put to death. Response to objections to the thesis (1) Objection: The death penalty should be abolished because even the highest form of punishment will not remove the evil from society. Response: If the death penalty was abolished, the convicted murderer has the potential to escape and kill again. This will spread more evil and give the option to kill again to the murderer. (2) Objection: The execution of a convicted murderer will never bring the victims back to life. Therefore it serves no purpose other than to kill. Response: Resurrection has never been the purpose of the death penalty. The family members just wan
Resurrection has never been the purpose of the death penalty. It is understood that the death penalty will not totally take away the emotions and feelings of the relatives, however the death penalty will ease those pains. The grief and despair would be considerably heavier to carry if the relatives knew that the perpetrator was only sentenced to prison and would be released after a period of time. Therefore, I feel that the death penalty will never become unnecessary. My twelve years’ experience in the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office convinced me that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. I saw many cases where professional burglars and robbers refused to carry weapons, for fear that a killing would occur and they would be charged with murder in the first degree, carrying the death penalty.(2) Van der Haag, Ernest and John P. Conrad, The Death Penalty: A Debate (New York: Plenum Press, 1983).
Some topics in this essay:
Academy Sciences,
Press January,
,
Attorney’s Office,
death penalty,
Response Resurrection,
penalty abolished,
death penalty abolished,
Specter Pennsylvania,
peace mind,
Arlen Specter,
mind victims families,
mind victims,
peace mind victims,
victims families,
University Press,
Bibliography Van,
Events July,
families crime,
people committing,
2 death penalty,
deters people committing,
penalty peace,
heinous crimes,
deters people,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1166
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Death Penalty Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|