Death Penalty
1. Issue: The goal of this paper is to show the pros and cons and give information on the juvenile death penalty. For the purpose of consistency in this paper, the definition that comes to mind when I hear “juvenile offenders” are those under the age of 18 at the time of their crime. Although there are those who have good arguments for the juvenile death penalty, which will be presented later on in my paper, I think that it’s a shameful practice. The following quote written by Robert Hirshon, is also my position on the juvenile death penalty: “The practice of executing individuals for crimes committed when they were children is unacceptable in a civilian society, irrespective of guilt or innocense. As citizens, persons under the age of 18 cannot vote, serve on juries, make medical decisions for themselves, or enter into contracts. We do not permit juveniles to conduct these activities because we believe that they lack the capacity to fully appreciate the consequences of their actions; it is deeply troubling that we, as a democratic society, then pass laws allowing their execution. Executing those on death row for the crimes committed as children, serves no principled purpose and only demeans our system of justice”
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the execution of children as young as sixteen is not ““cruel and unusual”” punishment. It has yet to make a definitive statement about children under sixteen. Of the thirty-eight states with the death penalty, fifteen have set the minimum age for death at 18, five set the minimum at seventeen, and seventeen have a minimum age of sixteen. The Federal Government sets the minimum age at eighteen (Dr. Geary, VCU CRJS). The following bullets are cases that lay the foundation of the death penalty today, Two out of three children sent to death row are people of color. Historically, two out of three people executed for crimes they committed as children have been African-American. During this century, the ratio has jumped to three out of four. Of the nine girls executed in U.S. history, eight were Black and one was American Indian. The Federal Government has imposed the death penalty against American Indian children for crimes they committed as young as ten years old (The National coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty). ∙ In Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988), the United States Supreme Court held that executions of offenders age 15 and younger at the time of their crimes are prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The combined effect of the opinions by Justice Stevens and Justice O'Connor in Thompson is to hold that no state without a minimum age in their death penalty statute can go below age 16 without violating Thompson, and in fact no state with a minimum age in its death penalty statute uses an age less than 16.
Some topics in this essay:
Supreme Court,
Peter Finn's,
Malvo Muhammad,
Robert Hirshon,
Washington DC,
Defense Fund,
United Constitution,
,
death penalty,
Unusual Punishment,
College Law,
texas 17,
supreme court,
crimes committed,
juvenile offenders,
united supreme court,
capital punishment,
minimum age,
united supreme,
age 18,
feel death,
feel death penalty,
juvenile death penalty,
minimum age death,
supreme court held,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2534
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Death Penalty Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|