Should drugs be allowed, it will deliver even competition. There won’t be a case of anybody gaining an unfair advantage, because everybody will use drugs. The world records would tumble. Athletes that did not have a chance could now have a better chance to be closer to the world’s best. And the competition would still remain justified.

There is also the ‘no fuss’ argument. Had drugs become legal in competitive sport, there will no longer be a fuss about drugs. Drug tests would be abolished, which means the organisers

Oliver Morton’s idea might have been a bit far-fetched for some, but it has proven something. Drugs have a place in modern competitive sport, and people who appose it have to accept it. The Olympics would still be a fair place, but with records smashed constantly. Sport is changing rapidly, and people have to adapt accordingly, not reject. Drugs are definitely a change in the modern times.

Furthermore, some drugs cannot be detected under the current drug test system. That means many athletes can already use it without being detected. So why bother trying to find athletes who are using drugs when they can’t be detected? Why not take the easy and sensible route of allowing the athletes to use drugs?

Another argument brought up was ‘Drugs in sport would cause a political and public relations nightmare. But if all athletes used drugs, it would be nothing new for the public. ‘Using drugs in sport is different form using drugs to treat a cold,’ has also been brought up. On the contrary, there is not much diffe

Some topics in this essay:
Oliver Morton, Oliver Morton’s, athletes drugs, drugs sport, drugs improve, using drugs, reject drugs, ‘using drugs, competitive sport, related argument, drugs detected, allow athletes,