If the Buyer and Seller wish to resolve this matter in a quick and less time consuming manner, then they should go for a settlement. In a settlement both parties have solved their problem on their own and have come to an understanding, and hence "settled" their case. A settlement is a quick solution to a rather cumbersome civil trial. Another way to resolve this case that is less time consuming, less risky, and rather quick is through Arbitration. In Arbitration, instead of a judge and a jury you have an expert in the area of the proceeding case. The expert's decision on the case is bounded by law, and hardly over-turned. An appeal can only be filed if the arbitrator was partial to one of the parties. If Arbitration is your choice, then it is important to remember that both parties have given up their right to a jury trial. If this is unappealing, then another method is open to you, which is Mediation. Mediation is almost the same as Arbitration, the only difference is that it isn't binding. Since it is supposed to give an opinion of the case it does not require that parties actually have to do what the mediator has decided. This way both parties can minimize losses and settle instead of a risky trial or a bound

Some topics in this essay:
Buyer Seller, Appellate Division, Mediation Arbitration, Arbitration Arbitration, Supreme Court, plaintiff defendant, buyer seller, , appellate division, require parties, jury trial, verdict based, evidence judge, set aside, appeal filed, supreme court,