The ADHD Controversy
Imagine living life as a child with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Your mind constantly shifting from one thought or image to the next. Every sound or activity around you is a distraction from the task at hand. You are easily bored, yet distracted by unimportant sights and sounds, your mind takes you from one thought or activity to the next. To your family and teachers, you seem to be in a constant whirlwind of disorganized activity. As a result, your daily life, relationships with others, and self esteem may be damaged. At times, you may even seem to be under complete control, making it hard for your family and teachers to be certain if there is something really wrong with you at all, or if you can actually control these behaviors. This makes it extremely difficult to determine whether the dramatic increase in children with ADHD is real, or just an easy alternative to dealing with an out of control child. Concern about the rise in childhood ADHD and its treatment with psychotropic medication calls for a need for physicians to diagnose this disorder based on biological markers rather than behavioral markers. ADHD is a neurologically based syndrome characterized by hyperactivity, distractibili
However, some doctors, parents, and educators argue that ADHD is not a real disorder. Currently, there is no unifying biological proof supporting ADHD, which makes the disorder and its treatment highly controversial. There is no doubt that putting certain children in a classroom together or in certain situations will create a problem scenario, and as Netherwood tells us, “some factions blame poor parenting, others blame the school system, and yet others blame the drugs and treatments” (Australian Parents 16). The most commonly prescribed treatments for ADHD are psycho-stimulants such as Ritalin, the long term side effects of which are unknown. Some say that because these medications do not stay in the body for long, there are no long term side effects – but that is not known for sure (Australian Parents 17). Information from a 1999 workshop on the long term effects of stimulant medication from the National Institute of Mental Health revealed that the effects of stimulant medication for ADHD children has been documented up to about 2 years of treatment, but they “have not conclusively addressed the long term effects of stimulant treatment of ADHD on important outcomes such as rate of psychopathology, incidence of substance abuse and dependence, antisocial behavior, accidents, educational achievement, social adjustment, and occupational status.” Such information is essential due to the many developmental changes children experience while being treated with stimulants such as Ritalin. In addition, an animal study on Ritalin has indicated that the drug may have a weak potential to cause cancer. Further studies are needed to be certain of the long term outcomes and effects of stimulants. It is known that these mind-altering drugs can dramatically affect behavior, have a high potential for abuse, and some of the side effects listed by Dixie Farley in FDA Consumer Magazine can include nervousness, difficulty sleeping, and appetite loss. Less common side effects are skin rash, nausea, dizziness, he
Some topics in this essay:
Family Physician,
Australian Parents,
Hyperactivity Disorder,
Mental Health,
Columbia Encyclopedia,
Academy Pediatrics,
Enforcement Administration,
Consumer Magazine,
ADHD Inattention,
Opponents ADHD,
children adhd,
term effects,
australian parents,
adhd real,
effects stimulant,
child progress academically,
parents 17,
sights sounds,
unimportant sights,
child progress,
disorders childhood,
american family physician,
australian parents 17,
term effects stimulant,
adhd real disorder,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1361
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The ADHD Controversy Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|