Evaluating President Bush's UN Speech

Bush backs this claim up with data, stating that the United Nations would not exist were it not for the United States and its contribution of troops from the U.S. Army. This creates a sense of legitimacy to the United Nations, showing that the United States is not some radical country trying to enforce an extremist regime change, but the most pivotal and influential country in the entire world.

President Bush goes on the further strengthen his claim by means of warrant. The first is his use of ethos, or appeal to authority, in stating that the United Nations helps to maintain a system of security and is so obliged to secure Iraq, a threat to the world’s security. Next, Bush u

In President Bush’s September 12, 2002 speech to the United Nations General Assembly, he runs the gamut of rhetorical techniques, including Aristotle’s and Stephen Toumlin’s models of rhetoric, to convince the individuals of the United Nations that his plight for war on Iraq was not only for the protection of the United States, but the world, from terrorism, the threat of the use of weapons of mass destruction and the rule of a ruthless dictator.

In Bush’s statement regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which also ties in with the Middle Eastern controversy, Iraqi regime change and the war on terrorism, Bush has a built in rebuttal to his opponents’ arguments, saying that there can be no peace for either side without freedom for both. He also goes on to say that America stands behind a democratic Palestinian state living in peace next to an Israeli state, but a Palestinian state without Yasser Arafat as the leader.

Bush uses three rhetorical questions in his speech to the United Nations, perhaps to force the members of the U.N. to consider the consequences that may occur should Hussein be allowed to continue to break United Nation treaties, “Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced or cast aside without consequence?”, “Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding or will it be irrelevant?” and “Are we to assume that he stopped when they left?”

Some topics in this essay:
Security Council, President Bush, United Nations, Gulf War, Middle Eastern, Human Rights, Council Resolutions, Middle East, Lastly Bush, Saddam Hussein, united nations, security council, iraqi regime, regime wishes, “if iraqi regime, iraqi regime wishes, “if iraqi, regime wishes peace, council resolutions, wishes peace, security council resolutions, president bush, mass destruction, human rights, weapons mass destruction,