Family Preservation
In 1980, the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act passed (P.L. 96-272), which required child protection services (CPS) to make "reasonable efforts" to prevent children from being placed into foster care. From this law, human services agencies and child protection agencies began to focus on the development of family preservation services (FPS). The emphasis of FPS, cumulated in 1993 in the Family Preservation and Support Act, which encouraged states to begin or further develop FPS by providing funds. "By the mid-1990s, most states had passed some form of legislation requiring the provision of preventivite child welfare services...closely reflecting the Homebuilders model" (Linblad, Dore and Stern, 1998, pg. 14-15). The Homebuilders model "is based on a crisis intervention theory, social systems theory and social learning theory" (Linblad et al. 1998, pg. 15). Their goal is to "add resources to relieve pressure and to facilitate the development of a safe, nurturing environment for children within the context of family" (Kinney, Haapala, and Booth, 1991, pg 3). There are different models of FPS, although many recognize the Homebuilders model as the prototypical family preservation service, yet all models have five charac
Besides keepng the children safer, they also benefit immensely from staying at home. By remaining in the home, safely with their family, children benefit from a number of psychological and developmental advantages. They are able to have a sencs of belonging and place, the security of membership and the assusrance of conforming to social norms. Children also benefit from the the continuance in identy and the special benefits of parent-child bonding. Whereas, "when children are removed from their family, they can be expected to suffer" (Nelson, 1990, pg 22). These hardships can include fear of the unknown, loss of identity, dinimished self-esteem, and stigmatization. "The adverse consequences for parents and siblings are identifiable as well--loss, humiliation, demoralizaiton, and a vulnerability to even greater incapacity in the future" (Nelson, 1990, pg 22). In other words, that new expenditures for services that succed in avoiding placement for a significant fraction of families served are likely to be ‘repaid' through savings that accrue within a relatively brief period of time....Over time, an enlarged family preservation capacity may prove capable not only avoiding those costs associated with the particular placements it prevents, but also of makin more affordable the price of placements it cannot prevent. (Nelson, 1990, pg. 18) In the placements that CPS agencies cannot prevent, FPS could have an important effect, simply by reducing the size of the demand for out-of-home placement. FPS may be able
Some topics in this essay:
Benedict Zuravin,
Haapala Booth,
Finally FPS,
Dore Stern,
Welfare Act,
Dept Health,
Support Act,
family preservation,
1990 pg,
nelson 1990 pg,
preservation services,
nelson 1990,
family preservation services,
et al,
foster care,
children benefit,
cps agencies,
1991 pg,
homebuilders model,
,
kinney et al,
psychological developmental advantages,
rate sexual abuse,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1035
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Family Preservation Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|