). I agree with this in saying the book is much better than the movie.

This story has received mixed reviews from the start. Fitzgerald states, “…the story is lacking the crucial emotional juice needed for the viewer to connect to the characters” (par. 5). However, on the other side of the spectrum the movie mom reports, “…is filled with visual splendor, valiant heroes, spectacular special effects, and irresistible characters” (par 1). This shows how one movie can be different to everyone who watches it. To me I would have to agree with the Fitzgerald review. I personally thought that that the movie was over rated, however, this opinion is brought by the fact I have read the book. To me it is clear the movie mom must not have read the Harry Potter books.

After watching Harry Potter then reading the books I am engaged to agree with Claudia Puig who writes, “Rowling wrote a book that’s clever and witty, as well as scary, fanciful and sometimes sad. But not enough of that emotional range ends up on the screen.” I guess the saying is true “the movie is never as good as the book.” I believe people who are able to read should do so with this novel instead of wasting their time sitting through the movie.

This movie was highly anticipated by moviegoers. Shawn Fitzgerald writes, “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the much-anticipated film adaptation of the first of t

Some topics in this essay:
JK Rowling’s, Harry Potter, Claudia Puig, Lord Voldemort’s, Peeves Poltergeist, Sorcerer’s Stone, Dursleys’ Harry, Hermione Granger, Watson Hermione, harry potter, Book Movie, par 1, sorcerer’s stone, book movie, read book, harry potter sorcerer’s, reading book, claudia puig, movie mom, movie movie, jk rowling’s, potter sorcerer’s stone,