Hasty War Against Iraq- A Bad Decision

Rushing into a war with Iraq is a bad idea for several reasons. First of all, an attack would mean the Muslim world would hate the U.S. even more than they already do. Second, Sadam Husein, the elected dictator of Iraq, would be more likely to attack America or other nations if he felt threatened by an imminent attack against him. Thirdly, there is no new evidence that Sadam poses a clear and present threat to the U.S. or other nations. Finally, the U.S. should attempt to attack Iraq without the help, cooperation and most importantly support of other countries.

An attack on Iraq would anger Muslims. They would not understand the motives of the U.S., just seeing it as another part of America’s egotistical imperialism. Muslims already hate America. Some countries in the Middle East m

Angering Muslims, making Sadam more likely to attack the U.S., a lack of evidence that Sadam poses an imminent threat to America or other nations, and a general lack of help from other countries are just some of the many reasons the U.S. should not go to war with Iraq. Rather than attack, why not try some alternatives first. Good diplomacy and a more well thought out plan of neutralizing whatever threat there really is, would be a better alternative to attacking Iraq.

And why create a problem when there is no real credible evidence of Sadam being a danger to the U.S. “The president’s case for an unprovoked attack on Iraq is circumstantial at best,” says Senator Robert C. Byrd. Senator Byrd states that Sadam Hussein is a threat, but he isn’t so much of a threat that we have to rush into war. There is no one new reason tha

Some topics in this essay:
Sadam Husein, Sadam Hussein, Muslims Sadam, Committee Sadam, Sadam Sending, , Middle East, United Nations, Muslims Using, attack iraq, war iraq, Tenet Chairman, evidence sadam, countries middle east, united versus, america nations, attack america, sadam poses, iraq attack, countries middle, sadam attack, evidence sadam poses,