Does hate crime imply on any case when a person is convicted for inflicting damage on someone "different"? It is often tricky to set a benchmark for measuring sufficiency of hate as a cause to label it in front of crime. The term can be conveniently stretched and squeezed by people with different ideas and biases. The four white policemen, who brutally beat African-American Rodney King Jr. half to death for merely speeding, are to be determined by the court’s judgment, as officers performing their duty. Hate, to those particular jurors and judge, was not a valid concern. To them, the beating

was not due to the officer’s resentment for a black man, but because they were simply disciplining an offender of the law. To the minority groups, the court’s ruling was outrageous. From their point of view, the savage beating was unnecessary and hate was obviously the factor which induced the four cops to perform such a malicious feat. For the reason that people have varying views and opinions, application of the term "hate crime" is not always relevant. Can we assume the murder of Nicole Simpson by OJ Simpson a hate crime since it involves a black man killing a white woman or are there more in depth twist to the case? People, who are willing to do a little thinking, do not just look at the difference of the victim and the convicted and draw conclusions of whether or not the crime is hate related; they examine all the other psychological elements also. The most common way of judgment is to ponder: if the victim was of a different race, religion, or sexual orientation, would the same injurious action still have taken place? In order to pictur

Some topics in this essay:
OJ Simpson, Prejudice Hate, King Jr, Asian Ironically, Iraqis Yugoslavians, Yugoslavians Americans, Iraq Yugoslavia, hate crime, Japanese Corporations, Asian Americans, race religion, sexual orientation, religion sexual, iraqis yugoslavians, born prejudice, religion sexual orientation, social security, race religion sexual,