Since the dawn of man, science has been filled with controversial advances. When the power of fire was first harnessed by ancient societies, many viewed it as a destructive force that needed to be banned. More recently, breakthroughs in areas such as artificial insemination have led to much controversy.

Initially, many such developments were considered scientifically unsound. However, time has proven their successes to be truly worthwhile. Ancient tribesman could stay warm through winter because of fire; thousands of babies have been born through artificial insemination. These examples demonstrate that although many scientific innovations are originally regarded with fear and suspicion, they eventually prove their worth to mainstream society.

Reproductive human cloning is a technologically feasible advancement that naysayers believe should be banned. However, these protesters oftentimes do not even understand the methods behind the procedure they are protesting against.

The first step in cloning a human would be to replace the haploid nucleus of the host egg with a donor’s nucleus containing a full set of genes. Applying an electrical current would th

en jolt the host egg into beginning growth. If implanted in a surrogate mother, the egg could then continue through its nine-month gestation period. The final stage would result in the birth of a perfectly healthy human clone.

If applied often enough, cloning could selectively breed the recessive disease-causing genes out of existence. Based solely on its possibility of preventing diseases, human cloning should be viewed as positive and permitted.

Not only could reproductive human cloning be used to thwart illnesses; in some cases it could be used to cure them. In instances where a genetic match is necessary for treatment, a clone would guarantee that the donor and recipient were compatible. Transplants that require a living donor, such as bone marrow transplants, could be perfectly matched through human cloning. A child could be born for the purpose of providing a transplant match. Reproductive human cloning would ensure that perfect matches such as these always occurred.

For these mentioned reasons, it is clear that the only sensible decision to make on reproductive human cloning is to allow it.

Perhaps the most advantageous aspect of allowing human cloning would be its ability to prevent the transmission of genetically inherited diseases. Normally, one gene that determines whether a person has a certain disorder is inherited from each parent. As long as a dominant gene is present, their children will not suffer from the ailment. “Dehabilitating illnesses such as Down’s Syndrome and Tay-Sachs disease only appear whenever both parents contribute a recessive gene to their offsp

Some topics in this essay:
Human Cloning, Syndrome Assuming, Cell Technology, Down’s Syndrome, Worcester Massachusetts, human cloning, Syndrome Tay-Sachs, reproductive human cloning, reproductive human, advanced cell technology, Advanced Cell, advanced cell, cloning human, cell technology, genetically inherited, down’s syndrome, human cloning allowed, host egg, child born, artificial insemination, genetically inherited diseases,