at allowing research stem cells” (Works cited, 3).

Michigan, where human cloning is a felony punishable by

Yet, there is a moral issue involved as well, concerning the ethics within the societal nature of cloning a human being. Is it really our God given right to be able to clone and use this technology as we see fit? Some see it as an insult to humanity, yet others are fighting for the chance to be able to use this technology for medical advances and cures.

“As of January 31, 2001, Britain became the first country to effectively

states with human cloning laws set forth civil penalties for violations,

One of the main legal challenges to the courts being addressed is the concern that the banning of reproductive, or therapeutic cloning violates the right to reproductive freedom. Since there is very little precedent in this area of law, the limited case law that already exists would suggest that a challenge based on the right to procreative liberty would probably fail. Elizabeth Foley, of Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University explains in a quote,

but others clearly see a potential for its use in the medical field. Some of the relating issues involved here are, whether it is unconstitutional for legislation to completely ban the research on cloning, how this technological change creates a challenge to the courts and legal system, and the cloning laws already in effect at the state level

Some topics in this essay:
School Law, House Lords, Michigan University, Michigan Criminal, , House Representatives, United Kingdom, United Policy, School Alta, United State’s, human cloning, reproductive cloning, legislative branch, cited 1, cloning human, legislative branch government, cloning bills, therapeutic cloning, legal scholars, federal level, branch government, reproductive cloning altogether, set forth civil, human cloning unconstitutional, forth civil penalties,