of classes. With the quick internet connection provided on the school’s network, the

student makes a few clicks and logs into Morpheus, a program that enables music fans to

download free music. Within a few minutes he is on his way to owning an unlimited

amount of songs at no cost. Everything this student is doing is legal, right? Wrong. The

downloaded music from the internet is copyrighted material.

Today’s internet is considered an “information superhighway,” a device where

anything from music, books, programs and information can be shared worldwide. Since

billions of people have the ability to access the internet, the content of the internet can be

difficult to regulate. One controversy which has risen because people can transmit and

share information broadly via the internet is that of copyright infringement. Arguments

over the rights to property on the internet have been heated. For example, Napster

(similar to Morpheus) was sued for providing software that enabled internet users to

download music at no cost. Since the internet is a device that is used w

the public. Why not let a person purchase a book and place the text on the internet?

Indeed, a difference does exist. First, if the library purchases several copies of a book,

where a person copies a compact disc onto a tape. When the tape is used for personal use,

number of people who have the ability to access the internet is so high, laws that are

borrow it, the compact disc is being passed along to the friend with the copyright. If the

Some topics in this essay:
Digital Works”, University Scranton, Church Scientology, Penny Copyright, CO” Fearer, Wollershiem Penny, Scientology Kearney, copyright laws, Copyright Laws, compact disc, Bob Penny, internet copyright, church scientology, copyright infringement, internet copyright laws, Ann Okerson’s, people ability, people ability access, ability access, access internet, copyright law, laws exist, copyright laws exist, ability access internet, material copyright laws,