Lanyer Vs Whitney
Not many women in the Elizabethan era could be called proto-feminist, whereas that term is used frequently when discussing Amelia Lanyer or Isabella Whitney. These two empowering authors have used their voices to elevate the roles and opinions of females of their time. Whitney’s disposition contributes to the manner of criticism against male discrepancy using a voice embedded in experience and knowledge to contradict the conflicting discussions encircling men’s attitudes concerning women’s roles and their lifestyles, while Lanyer uses her words and divine intuition to contest the hypocritical viewpoints of men concerning the purpose and responsibility of women, and to advocate for women’s religious and social equality. Both Lanyer and Whitney defy the roles and placement that society places upon them as women through their writings. In Whitney’s text “Last Wyll and Testament”, which describes her possible compulsory choice to leave London, she depicts the city as a place that is filled with economic misfortunes and injustices surrounding women. She uses her “Wyll” as a preparation of death, like all other wills, differing in the aspect that many things that were left, were not left to specific persons, bu
Amelia Lanyer and Isabella Whitney, though very different in personalities and opinions, both attempt to augment the current standard of what living as a woman should be. Whitney, taking a more selfish and current argument, writes in a fashion that allows a voice to come across stating that there is more than what is given and that it is women’s rights to try and achieve it; that there is more than being a housewife and that no one or thing should prevent that from happening. Whitney, taking a risk, even attempts to promote her overall status by empowering people to by her writings. Lanyer, avoiding the selfish aspect, embeds her argument in the reasoning behind the persecution of women, and the hypocritical stand that men have taken from it. Lanyer uses logic to try and dispute the history of women’s positions, she demonstrates that men have no true reason to devalue women, and that in reality, they should be held high than men, based on the fact that men’s hands hold the blood of Christ, and no sin women have committed could compare to that. Both women stepping out of the normal to raise their voices to change the way of life, and reform the basis of what it is to be a woman and the logic behind it. Amelia Lanyer, unlike Isabella Whitney, tries to persuade a change in the opinion of women by looking to the past and to the reasons why the inequality is there to begin with, whereas Whitney, not concerned with the history of the injustices, simply attempts to change the current viewpoints of women. Whitney and Lan
Some topics in this essay:
Isabella Whitney,
Wyll Testament”,
Eve’s Apologie,
Whitney Lanyer’s,
Christ Looking,
Apologie” Lanyer,
Lanyer Whitney,
,
Rex Judaeorum”,
Paradise Lanyer,
isabella whitney,
amelia lanyer,
“salve” eve’s apologie,
“salve” eve’s,
eve’s apologie,
lanyer isabella whitney,
amelia lanyer isabella,
lanyer isabella,
whitney taking,
divine intuition,
women whitney,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1037
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|