Marriage Laws Set Straight?
The proposed legalization of same-sex marriage is one of the most significant issues in contemporary American family law. This issue is one of the most heavily campaigned developments discussed in law assessments; one of the most debatable political questions and one of the most confrontational issues that are facing present day American courts. If same-sex marriage is legalized, it could be one of the most innovative policy verdicts in the history of America. Its affect on the parents, children, and same sex couples, families, and the social and political world will be astronomical. The issue is highly argumentative and is easy to see why from any perspective. Marriage is a promise to a spouse to stay loyal and faithful in all aspects of the words. The act of marriage includes financial, legal and social responsibilities for each partner. Whether the partnership is a male and a female or two males or two females, the rules of marriage are the same from most every angle. In the act of marriage two adults bond and lawfully and often, religiously, make a promise to take on its responsibilities. Marriage has changed throughout the years in how it is accepted in society. Years ago, divorc
Supporters of gay and lesbian unionization were furious with the results of the voting. Feeling stripped of their dignity and rights; homosexuals feel that the law is just one more prejudice against them. “I would like the ability,” says Laura Weinstock, a Californian citizen who is also a lesbian, “to have the equal benefits and protections of marriage … and respect.” As put by one political advertisement, “’It [Proposition 22] would legalize the discrimination against gay and lesbian families’” (Whemeyer, par. 1) Other reasons verified for turning away the idea of same gender marriages is the issue of parenting and whether or not it is safe to raise a child with two homosexual parents. Those who are against the idea say “it is better for children to be raised by two opposite-sex married parents, claiming that children need parents of both sexes as role models” (Wald, sec 47). They believe that a child raised by a homosexual couple will not be happy or stable in a family situation such as that. However, debaters say that there are already hundreds of thousands of children all over the nation, living with single gay parents, or homosexual parents that do have a partner. It is to be argued that the child would benefit if the parent were to marry. The child would gain more of a family stability if the partners were to marry and the non- biological parent could adopt the child. This would give the child a more “traditional” and “normal” family value and lead to less confusion. (Wald, sec. 48) One avid churchgoer stated of gay marriage, “It’s not a civil right, it’s a moral wrong.” The state of California recently voted on Proposition 22, a law to ensure that the state will not tolerate or allow marriages of the same sex. It declares, "Only marria
Some topics in this essay:
Laws Set,
Saints Mormon,
Weinstock Californian,
Post CITE,
same-sex marriage,
proposition 22,
Catholics Mormons,
gay lesbian,
wald sec,
California’s Proposition,
same-sex marriage legalized,
legalization same-sex marriage,
wehmeyer par,
american public,
sexual relations,
separation church,
marriage legalized,
par 1,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1236
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Marriage Laws Set Straight? Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|