Memories
Memories are stored the way we precieve them. The mind does not simply take in our experiences and store them in the exact form for accurate recall later. What this means is that memories, when they are brought up, are influenced by the situation in which they are retrieved. The enhanced recall of forgotten memories is false since there is no way to test real memories from false ones, and the hypnotists can influence the memory of the subject. When a hypnotized person recalls memories during a hypnotic state, there is no way to know if his memory is what he really perceived. Out of all the tests done in this area of hypnosis, there has not been a hypnotist or test that has been able to decipher if the memory was correct or not. The researchers would have to know the truths themselves before they could know if the memory was correct. There’s no way even the most sophisticated hypnotist can tell the difference between a memory that is real and the one that’s created (Muzur 965). If you have a highly suggestible person who is hypnotized and false information is given in to him, it may get imbedded just as strongly as true information. One psychologist tried to use a polygraph to tell the difference between real and fake
When retrieving a long-term memory there are many principles that set limits on the degree to which any attempt to recover a long forgotten memory can succeed such as, encoding, organization, and reconstruction. Still there is no test to see if they play an active part of recalled memories during hypnosis. The courts do not use testimony of people that have been placed under hypnosis. Another point to the unreliability of recalled memories during hypnosis, is that a person who has been lobotomized, a person who has received massive electroshock treatments, a person who has taken enormous dosages of mind-altering psychiatric drugs can, a person who has suffered substantial organic brain damage can testify can all testify in court; but a person who had been competently hypnotized by an experienced licensed professional who carefully followed strict guidelines to avoid undue suggestions, cannot testify in court (Tayloe 27). This shows how unreliable memories of hypnotized person are. There are other problems with age regressed people. They tend to act like the age they are suggested to return to. After many years of research, we are able to tell that the age-regressed people are only acting how they think a six or seven year old might act. When tested, they generally outperform real children of the age that they regress back too. Age-regress
Some topics in this essay:
Clever Hanz,
,
Robert True,
hypnotized person,
Martin Orne,
age-regressed people,
memories hypnotized person,
influence memory,
recalled memories,
memories hypnotized,
recalled memories hypnosis,
correct day,
memories brought,
memory subject,
testify court,
myers 225,
influence memory subject,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 915
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Memories Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|