Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Fordism

How useful was the concept of fordism to understanding patterns of social, political and economic development in post war modern societies.

Henry Ford founded the Ford Motor company in 1903. In 1908 the company initiated the production of the Model-T (of which the company sold 15 million). It was the first car of its kind using a new type of production which involved the mass production of consumer durables which were made on moving assembly live techniques operated with the semi-skilled labor of the mass worker. Before cars were produced by hand which was both time consuming and very expensive. The actual physical production of the car was also a problem due to numerous parts involved, the Model-T took only 12.5 hours per car to build from start to finish, a build time that would have been impossible to sustain on a continuous basis before.

It was from this new process of the production line that Fordism took its name; he had come up with a way of producing cars that broke the overall production process down into hundreds and sometimes thousands of small, individualized, highly-specialized parts. By introducing a complex division of labor, ford reasoned that costs could be lowered and profits


The assembly line, and the mass-production that fordism brought on, led to a dependence on faith and technology that is still very much with us today. We rely on scientists to solve all of our problems. Humans today go around polluting the planet presuming that some day soon technology will be created to clean it up.

It is because of fordism that the world grew. While the assembly line allowed for a reduction in workforce size, far more jobs were created than lost. As more and more cars were produced, there was a need for more and more roads. And with those roads came a need for “roadside” business. Motels, cafes, gasoline stations, these were all natural outgrowths to the increased use of the automobile which Henry ford had created.

Fordism entailed increased mechanization of the labor process and the potential for heightened capitalist control over the pace and intensity of work. Realization of that potential involved bouts of explicit class struggle. Contesting liberal capitalism’s emphasis on private property rights, industrial workers counterpoised conceptions of industrial democracy and collective participation in work life in order to legitimate their new and embattled industrial unions. In the postwar context of Cold War fears, and access to an unprecedented affluence, such challenges were contained within the bounds of a vision of liberal capitalism as the social system best able to secure- on a global scale- individual rights and liberties and a more generalized prosperity. On the basis of union participation in the hegemonic world-vision, the state and capital accepted industrial unions as junior partners in the postwar project of reconstructing a liberal capitalist world order.

According to some, the introduction of information technologies would shift employment from the manufacturing and extractive industries towards the service sector, especially its media and high tequnology companies. As a consequence, assembly line workers would be replaced by white-collar professionals. In parallel, bureaucrats and industrialists would loose there political and economic power to scientists and academics, who had the skills to invent the new information technologies.

increased. The production was a new way of thinking and doing, helped made possible by new advances in machinery.

The assembly line, mass production, and the proliferation of automobiles have also had its negative effects on society. To begin with the assembly line in itself was dehumanizing. Ford himself said “the man who puts in a bolt does not put on the nut; the man who puts on the nut does not tighten it”. The assembly line turns a human craftsman into part of a machine. This dehumanizing process has also unfortunately greatly affected our society. Each worker on the line has a specific task to perform, repeatedly and monotonously for hours on end. The more specialized each worker becomes, the more efficient the line. Human beings started to loose their freedom and the machines stared taking over. The education act reinforces this idea because the children were being produced for different parts of the factory.

It is generally as

Some topics in this essay:
America UK, Henry Ford, Ford Motor, Theo Nicholes, Henry Ford”, Association Selden, Cold War, Max Weber, , assembly line, Amin Post-Fordism, henry ford, post war, outside cities, modern societies, cars produced, fordism seen, war period assembly, social organization, information technologies, people live, post war modern, post war period, war modern societies, development post war,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2162
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Fordism


Professional Papers:
Changes in America: The 1920s290 words
Behavioral Science Models and Organizations1139 words
Business Concepts2183 words
Issues of Production ampamp Manufacturing Management6841 words
Economic Development in Thailand6941 words
Organizational Learning: Mechanistic vs. Bureaucratic1098 words



Student Written Papers:
Fordism1987 words
Fordism vs Taylorism in Worker Resistance940 words
Have we entered the new ere of cultural production1174 words
Evaluate the Fordist Era of Work2959 words
Globalization5164 words

Look at even more essays on Fordism
More Science Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers