Moral Implication
On June 12, 1994, the entire United States was asphyxiated to the television. One famous man had been arrested for the brutal stabbing murders of his ex-wife and her estranged lover. This famous man seemed clearly guilty. Soon enough he was presumed “guilty” because he was at the scene of the crime, and because of the evidence gathered, fingers were pointed at him; he had no where to run. The press was in the sky, in his trees, and at his door, hounding him for a statement. He went on to hire the best possible attorneys he could. He knew his case would be difficult to prove. The defense lawyers, with their lives on hold, spent endless hours studying the case and gathered the facts. Many times the defense had been labeled “disturbers of the peace,” due to the belief that they were lying to cover up their client. The testimonies of witnesses took nine months and encompassed almost 120 people, forty-five thousand pages of evidence and more than one thousand exhibits (CNN 1). A year and half later the defendant, O.J. Simpson, walked away a free man, thanks in part to the legal system that defended him, and his devoted attorneys. The judicial system of the United States places defense lawyers in a position in which their moral
suppressing ordinary ethical concerns. They learn to be comfortable with the The real emphasis is on the legal aspect; the legal obligation the counselor must be concerned with is defending his guilty client. As a counselor he represents his client as if they were wrongly accused. The counselor read the police report and do their own investigating on how the case was handled and what happened. They don’t lie, they find the questionable facts about the case and use those as their focus point. When presenting the case, the lawyer looks at the client’s profile “if my client has done some volunteer work I can point to that to suggest to the court that this person is redeemable and deserves special consideration”(Daw 1). Are there any moral implications when a lawyer takes on the case of a guilty person? Sure there are, the lawyer has a burden to carry on his heart. Many lawyers have problems with this, “I will represent my client up to and only up to the point where it becomes morally impermissible for me to do so based on values that I had long before law school and have retained despite the corrosive influence of legal education”(Heafy 9). Becoming a lawyer is no easy task. requiring years of academic and practical training, devotion and a desire to attain that goal. To become a lawyer in the U.S. students must have graduated from an American Bar Association (ABA) certified college. Then they must take and pass the “Bar” exam, a six-hour 200 question test. Then comes the biggest decision, to prosecute or to defend. The aim of the legal profession is to seek out the truth and provide justice for everyone who deserves it. The theory most commonly associated with law is the fight system. The strength of the fight system is in the very name of the theory. This is when either side of the case strives to bring attention to evidence that is favorable for their cause. The legal system is based on this principal. Clients approach lawyers in hoping that their case will be won, with whatever it may take. In the O.J. Simpson trial the defense did not mention any of the facts that might have incriminated their client, they were completely discarded as if they didn’t happen. In today’s society there have been more and more attorneys leaving out facts pertinent to the case, thus representing the job the lawyer was hired to do, whatever it takes . “We obtain the fairest decision when two men argue ‘unfairly,’ they bring out evidence and ideas that might not be brought out otherwise, this is lackadaisical inquiry into the case by means of the truth system”(Frank 1) . In my opinion I feel that this fight system is the only efficient path to the truth. It is after the cases have been brought forth, that the judge or the jury are required to decipher fact from fallacy. The lawyers must use their knowledge of the legal system and of the facts to prove their clients innocence. Lawyers are the ones who transform abstract rights into reality. Too many times in America, lawyers have their work cut out for them because the public looks at the man in the defendants chair as a bad guy without any human qualities(Black 12). Attorneys must fight to convince,
Some topics in this essay:
OJ Simpson,
Dictionary Morality,
,
Association ABA,
defense lawyers,
legal system,
defending guilty,
client guilty,
defense lawyer,
fight system,
legal profession,
emphasis legal aspect,
innocent proven guilty,
aspect legal obligation,
legal profession arguing,
represent client,
jury charge,
today’s society,
legal aspect legal,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2152
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Moral Implication Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|