Morality In Defending The Guilty
On June 12, 1994, the entire United States was glued to the television. One famous man had been arrested with the brutal stabbing murders of his ex-wife and her estranged lover. This famous man seemed clearly guilty. He was soon enough presumed “guilty” because he was at the scene of the crime, and because of the evidence gathered, fingers were pointed at him: he had no where to run. The press was in the sky, in his trees, and at his door, hounding him for a statement. He went on to hire the best possible attorneys he could. He knew his case would be a difficult one to prove. The defense lawyers with their lives on hold spent endless hours studying the case and gathering the facts. Many times the defense was labeled “disturbers of the peace”, due to the belief that they were lying to cover up their client. The testimonies of witnesses took nine months and encompassed almost 120 people, Forty-five thousand pages of evidence and more than one thousand exhibits (CNN, pg 1). a year and half later the defendant, O.J. Simpson, walked away a free man, thanks in part to the legal system that defended him. This is what being a defense lawyer is all about, doing whatever it takes to defend your clients rights set forth by the con
The real emphasis is on the legal aspect, legal obligation the counselor must be concerned with in defending his guilty client. He must represent his client in the manner that they were wrongly accused. They read the police report, and do their own investigating on how the case was handled and what happened. They don’t lie they find the questionable facts about the case and use those as their focus point . When presenting the case the lawyer looks at the clients profile “if my client has done some volunteer work I can point to that to suggest to the court that this person is redeemable and deserves special consideration”(Daw,1). Are there any moral implications when a lawyer takes on the case of a guilty person? More than often it is the prosecution who is bending the line, and trying for a harsher sentencing. The philosophical meaning of morality to me is doing the right thing. Every walk of life, since the beginning of time has been confronted with the meaning of morality. In many respects the rules of primitive morality accord fairly closely with those observed in a sophisticated, civilized society. It is just a fact of life that every person will have different views and different feeling on even the simplest of things. Every thought that goes through the mind hits the right or wrong decision making part of the body. That is when we look at the moral implications. is guilty or their defense harms innocent parties.” (McCluskey,1)
Some topics in this essay:
Association ABA,
Pg1 Morality,
,
Webster’s Dictionary,
OJ Simpson,
defense lawyers,
legal system,
defending guilty,
defense lawyer,
innocent proven guilty,
emphasis legal aspect,
legal aspect legal,
aspect legal obligation,
moral guilt,
represent client,
guilty person,
legal obligation,
proven guilty,
guilty client,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1479
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Morality In Defending The Guilty
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|
Example Essays Home
