A Civil Action
In a trial, rhetoric is an important part in the success or failure of a case. This is a double-edged sword; it can play out either good or bad. Rhetoric can be used to stress an important detail or idea, but it can also to derail the other side’s case, or, just take them out mentally. Unfortunately for Jan, it didn’t work to his advantage. Facher’s repeated objections caused Jan to lose track and to disturb him. This is not fair, nor right, but it is a part of the legal game that a lawyer must be ready to deal with. If a lawyer is thrown off balance by these tactics, the jury will most likely notice this, and it can be seen as a sign of inconsistency; hurting the chances of presenting a successful case. However, these tactics are viewed differently, depending on the side of the courtroom one happens to be on. To the defendant who happens to be using these “tools of the trade”, it is a defense which can only help to serve your side better. To the attorney though, nothing can hurt them more. These rhetoric objections serve only one purpose in their mind: to obscure the truth. In a case with so much at stake, these are the times which these tactics are critical, and, they do the most damage. With the Woburn trial over, the
Some topics in this essay:
Unfortunately Jan, Civil Action, , financial disadvantage, judiciary system, rules values”, judge skinner,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 834
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on A Civil Action
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
 |
All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2008 ExampleEssays.com DMCA HMS
|
|
Example Essays Home