Arguement That Socrates Does Believe In Athenian Gods
Back in Socrates’ day, it was easy to be charged with crimes. Some of those charges may have a good reason behind it, others may be indicted for a foolish reason. One of the charges brought against Socrates was that he did believe in the same gods as the city of Athens. The only reason Socrates found himself facing the jurors was that several people in Athens disliked him because he seemed to be wiser than they were and he was able to embarrass them. It did not matter whether the accusation was true or not. The only way for Socrates to be found innocent was for to make a convincing enough plea, or “apology”, to appease the members of the jury. Although the verdict found him to be guity, Socrates should have been found innocent on the charge that he did not believe in the same gods as the city of Athens because he makes several references to different gods, he insists that he believes in daimonia, and he explains how it is impossible for him to believe in daimonic gods and not other gods.Throughout his apology, Socrates often refers to several gods that others believe in and even swears his innocence to them. One of the first references he makes is when he explains that the reason he preaches his beliefs is because t
Socrates then takes it one step further by proving that that even if daimons are only children of gods, it still means that he must believe in gods. By believing in the children of gods, one must believe in gods in order for the children to exist. It is foolish to believe in children of mules and not believe in mules, and by only believing in the children would be the same concept. Thus, Socrates explained that since he believes in daimons, who are either gods or children of the gods, it would be absurd to think that he does not believe in the same gods as the city of Athens. Also, Socrates proves to the jury that Meletus does not even have a valid argument in accusing Socrates. Socrates asks Meletus what he is accusing him of and Meletus says that he does not think Socrates believes in any gods at all. Meletus has changed his accusation against Socrates, and Socrates explains this by saying that the original accusation is that he believes in different gods than the city of Athens. In order to convince the jury, Socrates tells Meletus that he is accusing him of “not believing in gods, but believing in gods” (77). To this argument, Meletus has no response. While still questioning Meletus, Socrates makes an obvious point about his belief in daimonia. Meletus unintentionally and indirectly admits that he has made a false accusation against Socrates. It seems, however, that the jury does not catch this mistake. First, Meletus says that he thinks Socrates does not believe in any gods. However, this point changes the more Socrates questions him because he later says that it is true that if Socrates believs in daimons he has to believe in gods. After Socrates asks him several questions, Meletus finally agrees that Socrates does indeed believe in daimonia. By getting Meletus to admit that he agrees about Socrates’ belief in daimons, he then continues to prove that daimons are gods. Throughout all of Socrates arguments and points proving that he does indeed believe in at least some of the same
Some topics in this essay:
,
Meletus Socrates,
Throughout Socrates,
Socrates Socrates,
Hades Socrates,
believe gods,
Athens Otherwise,
city athens,
gods city athens,
daimons gods,
gods city,
gods socrates,
believe gods city,
gods children,
meletus socrates,
Socrates Meletus,
socrates believe,
gods gods,
impossible believe,
socrates believe gods,
socrates found innocent,
believe gods socrates,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1365
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|