The first case to be discussed is the West Virginia Board of Education verses Barnette. This is one of the earliest cases involving the First Amendment and education, the court rulled in the favor of Barnette that students may not be forced to salute the flag if it violates their religious principles. In doing that it over turned its own decision in an identical case only three years earlier, and demonstrated that, even at its highest and presumable at most levels, constitutional jurisprudence can be fickle. Many of the famous court opinions leave us with a sentence or two that stands out as uncommon wisdo

Now for the second Supreme Court case is the Abington School District verses Schempp. This case which deals with the issue of prayer and related practices in public school, is essentially a re-run of the Engel verses Vitale from 1962. It its decision in Schempp the court basically said “we meant what we said in the previous years case.” The reaction to Engel where in the court. When the court struck down theuse of a school scripted general prayer declaring obedience to God, had been accused of legislating “ never adjudicated with on eye on Kremlin and the other in the NAACP” and the congressman called it “the most tragic rulling in the history of the United States.” A Gallup Poll indicated that 76% of American citizens supported the concept of a constitutional amendment to reverse the effects of Engel and later Schempp

Some topics in this essay:
School District, Board Education, Establishment Clause, Similarly Supreme, Speech Clause, Exercise Clause, Gallup Poll, Clause Beginning, Engel Schempp, Supreme Court, supreme court, district verses schempp, abington school district, free speech clause, abington school, speech clause, free speech, school district, verses schempp, district verses, school district verses, religious principles, exercise clause, free exercise clause, free exercise,