Majors Meeting Needs
The pressing issue in this editorial in the number of current students in colleges changing their majors. So much so that is has raised the question, why this is happening all across the country? In trying to answer this, the author Mark Clayton of the Christian Science Monitor poses the argument that post generation-X students in their ‘soul searching’, have chosen new majors at a very impressive rate. This change-rate he attributes to many of the significant “social ills” that have taken place in the early part of the 21st century in the United States. Events like the “Enron and World Com Scandals, the 9/11 World Trade Center Bombings, the need not to be perceived as “ironic about life”, and influential television shows have all supposedly produced the “social-ills” or social influences that are responsible for the unprecedented alteration of majors across college campuses. The reasons Clayton gives for this student movement of majors is embedded in the students “sole searching” need not to succumb these “social-ills”. The only scientific evidence Clayton gives is a study completed by “Sallie Mae”. This survey (not yet published) makes the claim that if a college is witn
After setting up the basic framework for the piece; Clayton then supplements it by quoting from some of the extreme examples of major-changes the survey observed. He also goes on to quote a couple of students and faculty in these colleges which represented this trend, “Two years ago, Matt Riley was a biology major…He converted to religious studies…‘I had a variety of curiosities about the transformation and development of religion,’”. In this college at Indiana University, Bloomington, the study showed a tremendous number of students changing majors where “religious-studies jumped 50 percent in two years”. A large basis for Clayton’s evidence then comes from this study and interviews that also parallels this major-changing trend across the nation. In light of this evidence Clayton concludes that the more profound reasoning for this alarming major-change rate stems from the significant events that have taken place so far in the 21st century. He implies this several times through out the editorial, “These institutions have seen a lot of activity on their campuses since 9/11...Driven by corporate scandals, hit television shows, a homeland-security push, and post-”Gen-X” soul searching, many students are choosing majors that offer solutions to societal ills and, they hope, strong job prospects”. This quote attests to how Clayton is making his argument. This shocking variation must be happening for some reason; and for Clayton it becomes this idea that social influences of the 21st century are responsible for the students making these decisions. The general implication then becomes this idea of how important social influences are in students lives. This lasting impression implies this idea through the very nature of his argument. The most ambiguous evidence that can
Some topics in this essay:
University Bloomington,
Center Bombings,
Sallie Mae,
World Com,
Physical Therapists,
Max Bickford”,
Science Monitor,
,
Matt Riley,
percent colleges,
social influences,
21st century,
Com Scandals,
changing majors,
idea social influences,
student six,
17 percent,
world com,
physical therapists,
evidence clayton,
statistical evidence,
students changing majors,
17 percent colleges,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1224
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Majors Meeting Needs Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|