Passive Social Control
A whole society being captured due to greed is not something we are not used to hearing about. Thousands dying within a matter of days due to murder and all forms of brutality has been a reality. Can any of us really imagine having our freedom and everything else that we are used to be taken away within a matter of time. Could we actually visualize social change due to factors such as newcomers or a revolution? Well that is what the people in Kenya faced during the Mau Mau Rebellion between the years of 1952-1956. Passive social control, and the forms used has been an issue when discussing the effectiveness of the Africans resistance. Some would say that there was no such thing as passive resistance, and some like myself would say that passive social control played a huge factor in the shaping of the Africans responses. There is no way to say that violence was not another huge part of the rebellion, but I believe that it played very evenly with propaganda and other passive acts. Intimidation, manipulation, and violence were the keys to a successful defeat. The intimidation scared people, while manipulation turned people of the same culture against one another. And violence came next.
Manipulation was also evident on the night of March 26, 1953 when the Mau Mau guerillas raided the Naivasha police station, which angered and humiliated the British. In return the Mau Mau was not only blamed for the act, but the destruction was also presented to the world as the work of the Mau (Maloba, 101). It is easy to see how many of these passive social control factors played a part. For instance when the “White Paper” was published and said that the Mau were” a conspiracy designed to dominate first the Kikuyu tribe and then all other Africans, and to drive out all of the other races and take power in Kenya. This strategy was successful because it only presented a negative view of the Africans. This strategy sometimes is still successful today. The only difference now is that both parties are capable of putting out information. So the reader or viewer has the chance to come to there own conclusions. The Mau with their beliefs and oaths were taking place in a revolt, and the British through manipulation totally put a negative portrayal on it to deny it of everything. The Mau were called “ savages, anti-Christian, anti-white, and criminals”. This had to be one factor that played a major part in the limitations that the Africans had to effect social change. The British focused on the biases and the information that they knew would not sit right with the harder for the people of Africa to battle against the British. Although violence was heavily involved as well as the use of new weaponry traders were a combination of people who fell victim to manipulation and intimidation. easiest ways to catch them off guard. Finding out that information is what led to the British beating the Mau Mau people of Kenya. people all around
Some topics in this essay:
Mau Maloba,
Mau Rebellion,
Mau Mau,
Home Guards,
SOCIAL CONTROL,
Internet Mau,
George Erksine,
Intimidation British,
Mount Kenya,
Rifles Besides,
social control,
passive social,
passive social control,
mau mau,
people kenya,
social change,
mau mau guerillas,
resistance passive,
mount kenya,
mau guerillas,
form control,
vital information,
intimidation manipulation violence,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1189
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Passive Social Control
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|
Example Essays Home
