real minor children and that which appears to be a depiction of a minor engaging in sexual conduct. All of these laws were passed to protect the children from being victims to some adults in movie. Although the supreme court over ruled the 1996 law. The Supreme Court said the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 violated the first amendments guarantee of free speech because no children are harmed in the production of the images defined by the act. And the court majority said the act too broadly covers speech with serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. But what have we done to make it safe for the children while they are on the Internet.

One possibility, created and passed into law, is encoding the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (http) and File Transfer Protocol (ftp) that would make Internet pornographic sites easier to be censored by software similar to Net Nanny. This would make it easier since the program will not only scan the page the entire site itself. Sites will be censored by a certain code that is relayed to the computer when the Internet navigator tries to enter the site. The computer will send a request and the site will send an answer, or a code that will trigger the software telling it that this is an adult site; thus, children cannot browse the site. It would be a hard task to make every pornographic site adhere to the law; of all pornographic sites in existence, 70% are run from American locals.

It is probable to say that anyone who has been on the net long enough, regardless of age, will come across Internet pornography. Proprietors of Internet pornography are in business to make money, and will do anything to achieve this. They advertise their websites by a variety of ways, one of which is by buying space on a website. With this many problems arise, for anyone who visits these sites become unwilling subjects of Internet porn. The Internet porn industry has little regards for the unknowing victim.

Even if the CDA was passed little that can be done to stop all transmitted obscene material. The Internet has experienced an extraordinary growth. The number of host computers—those that store information and relay communications—increased from about 300 in 1981 to approximately 9,400,000 by the time of the trial in 1996. Roughly 60% of these hosts are located in the United States. About 40 million people used the Internet at the time of trial, a number that expected to mushroom to 200 million by 2000. How can it be possible to regulate all Internet transmissions with user numbers at 200 million?

Some topics in this essay:
Net Nanny, American’s Constitutional, Prevention Act, Usage Internet, Internet Internet, Code Title, Internet Children, Proprietors Internet, Act Legislation, Attorney Barrows, child pornography, internet pornography, code title 18, american children, pornographic sites, internet porn, title 18, protect children, 18 section, children internet, code title, title 18 section, child pornography prevention, sale purchase receipt, pornography prevention act,