The arguments for and against the existence of god, is a very controversial issue and always has been. There are many different ways of viewing the idea of God and the cosmological argument is one that was adopted by the likes of the 13th century philosopher, Thomas Aquinas.

The first thing to note about the cosmological argument is that it is A Posteriori. This means that the argument is based on experience and it is what we see in the world and universe from which a conclusion is derived from.

The cosmological argument is also known as the first cause argument because it is based on the idea that there is a first cause behind everything including the universe. Contingency is another important basis for this argument. Contingency is something, which may or may not happen. An event or condition depends on something else, which too may not happen. It’s the idea that everything is dependent on something else which without it, something would have not come into existence or happened. Things exist around us but they could have just as easily not existed.

The cosmological argument strongly bases itself on the idea of contingency and states that things came into existen

Even if the universe did start at one point, there is no reason for something to be needed to enforce this universe to begin. Bertrand Russell agreed with Humes argument.

Some topics in this essay:
Degree Excellence, Thomas Aquinas, Bertrand Russell, God God, Aquinas Coplestons, God” Contingency, David Hume, , cosmological argument, god god, universe existence, existence god, external force, cosmological ◘, argument based, cosmological argument cause, aquinas believed, believed cause, chain causes, cause god god, brought universe existence, motion / change,