According to recent animal research, stem cells have been found to adapt to new tissues and its functions. Essentially, stem cells seem to have the capability to be “reprogrammed.” Also, the cells seem to be able to regress to earlier levels of development with the possibility of becoming totipotent once again. To simplify the medical language into laymen’s terms, stem cells, with further research, have the potential to be formed into specific cells needed to help cure diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and diabetes along with numerous other possible benefits. Researchers are still trying to determine what makes a stem cell form into a specific body part and whether spare body parts created by this research would be rejected or accepted by a patient’s immune system. However, these questions may never have the chance to be answered due to incredible controversy surrounding this issue.

Stem cells are capable of dividing and becoming specialized cells. It is this capability that makes these cells unique. According to Dr. Wolfgang Lillge, “the stem cell with the greatest potential is the fertilized egg cell, which is capable of developing into a complete organism.” Dr. Lillge also states that

In conclusion, stem cell research continues to stir up heated debate. Is it morally and ethically wrong to use stem cells from embryos? When is an embryo a human life form? Both sides hold strongly to their convictions regarding this issue. For many, it is their religious views that make stem cell research appalling. Nevertheless, opposition to stem cell research is not confined to religions. While it is true that there are no immediate or long-term guaranteed benefits from stem cell research, the mere possibility of great benefits warrants this research to be conducted. Stem cell research puts us on the edge of revolutionizing medicine. The possible benefits are astounding, but, to some, these benefits come with a grave price. Are we killing humans in order to cure diseases? Again, the answer to this question would depend on the stance one takes on when an embryo becomes a human life form. Yes, these cells are taken from fertilized eggs, which usually have an end result of producing a baby. However, the fertilized eggs used to extract the stem cells have no chance in becoming a human child because they are not to be implanted in a woman’s uterus. These fertilized eggs are destined to be destroyed and thrown out without a thought. Would it be wrong to want for these fertilized eggs to have greater meaning and to serve some useful purpose? Or shall they be created in vain? Those who suffer from diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, or other numerous debilitating disorders stand the chance of finding a

Some topics in this essay:
President Bush, Dr Lillge, Research Science, Research CAMR, stem cell, cell research, stem cell research, stem cells, Wolfgang Lillge, human life, fertilized eggs, fertility clinics, federal funding, embryos fetuses, embryo human, embryo human life, human life form, private funding, opposed stem cell, disease diabetes numerous,