In an attempt to measure structural change in Russia, it is important to notice that the transition from the centrally planned system to the market-based system severely disrupted the economy and the process of data collection. For the purpose of plan fulfillment, Soviet-era statistics tended to exaggerate actual output. After the collapse, enterprises began to switch from receiving subsidies to paying taxes, which gave them an incentive to understate output. Therefore, the post-Soviet production collapse, although real, was somewhat milder than it appears in official statistics.

Referring to the statistics provided by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the following information regarding the industrial and manufacturing sectors of the country was obtained:

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Industry* 79.1 96.7 95.5 102 94.8 111 111 104.9

Agriculture* 88 92 95 101.5 86.8 104.1 107.7 106.8

* The data provided is percentage of the same period a year ago.

The above chart demonstrates that both agricultural and industrial outputs experienced significant declines in years 1994-1999. The year 1997 proved to be an exception for both sectors. The economic c

Some topics in this essay:
Russian Federation, World Bank, Yegor Gaidar, Soviet Russian, Change Russia, Anatoly Chubais, Soviet Union, Foreign Loans, Post-Soviet Era, foreign debt, change russia, structural change russia, structural change, 1999 2000, 1999 2000 2001, manufacturing sectors, collapse soviet, soviet union, 1998 1999 2000, service sector, 1996 1997 1998, 1990 share, 1997 1998 1999, 2000 2001,