This framework is designed to aid in project planning/development, management, and evaluation and is considered a living document. Prior to any application, revisions may be necessary to customize the framework for a specific type of project. Lessons learned from previous projects should be incorporated to improve the framework.

During Project Execution the focus on the project management team is to execute the plan. By investing time and money in proper planning, project execution is more likely to be a smooth, continuous process. The most important factor is to stick to the plan, or make formal changes according to the change management plan. By adhering to schedule, budget, and audit plans, success will follow. With every project, problems will arise. The problem must be identified, the root cause determined, and corrective actions (both immediate and long term) implemented. Feedback to prevent recurrence completes the problem resolution. Conflicts are also expected on any project team. The nature of the conflict varies from personal conflicts between the team members or conflicts with customer representatives. First the source of conflict and impact on the project must be determined. A solution is required to be implemented and again, feedback is critical to prevent recurrence. The Project Execution phase relies heavily on the plan developed in Project Preparation, but also requires prompt and rapid reaction to problems and conflicts that arise.

Some topics in this essay:
Project Execution, Patrick Ray, Project Preparation, Corwin Corporation, Dan West, Project Termination, Project Team, Path PERT, Peters Company, Management Project, project team, project execution, project preparation, lessons learned, project management, project framework, breakdown structure, cost estimation, planning project, project manager, planning project execution, project life cycle, 2 breakdown structure, peters company project, prior approving project,