The author advocates that the NCAA should fully comply with Title IX and that any discrepancy between participation of males and females in sport comes as a result of sociological conditioning that women have been subjected to. Some people may argue that men should receive more good s than women because they have more experience more talent and a greater level of participation. Thus they should rec

The “Ultimate justification” in favor of unequal funding for women’s sport stems from the idea that men’s sport will suffer as a result of the lack of capital. Men’s football coaches argue that they will not be able to field exceptional teams and thus ticket sales will suffer. Consequently the funds lost will affect both men’s and women’s athletics. I agree with the flaw to this argument stating that the redistribution will cause change in men’s programs but not necessarily for the worst. Title IX is in effect all over the US so there is no reason why this should affect the quality of teams on the field. If team quality is not affected then spectator turnout would remain at the status quo and thus revenues would not decrease.

Some topics in this essay:
Title IX, Stoll Beller, Gender Equality, , title ix, Jennifer Beller’s, status quo, Article Critique, status quo argument, Relative Gender, Justice Relative, Athletics Scarcity, justice relative gender, college athletics scarcity, athletics scarcity, college athletics, relative gender, quo argument, argument college athletics, funding women, quo argument college, equal opportunity, argument college, justice relative, Quo Argument,