Canada and Mexico are the second and third largest export markets for U.S. agricultural products. Exports to the two markets combined are greater than exports to Japan or the 15 member European Union, which means more money for the U.S. With that being known, the positive aspects of NAFTA begin to flow in. This helped to more than double trade a

To me the pros and cons of this subject are endless. Why am I for NAFTA you may ask? Because I feel it has helped the U.S. Economy, as well as Mexico and Canada, more than it has hurt them. Statistics wise, NAFTA has had more positive aspects then negative, as far as the economy goes, NAFTA also came to a more positive side rather negative.

mong the three countries, from $306 billion in 1993 to $621 billion in 2003. It also helped expand U.S. exports to Canada and Mexico from $142 billion to $263 billion during that decade. It has helped grow Mexican exports to NAFTA partners by 232 percent, or $143 billion, between 1993 and 2001. As for employment, manufacturing output increased 44 percent in the 1990’s, which increased employment by 20 million between 1993 and 2000. As for agricul

Some topics in this essay:
Canada Mexico, States' NAFTA, European Union, Trade Agreement, Mexico Canada, Benefits Agriculture, canada mexico, 1993 2000, Brian Deshong, nafta positive, positive aspects, trade deficit, employment manufacturing, nafta partners, helped double, 2003 helped,