The Right To Choose
More than fifty years ago, Richard Doll and Bradford Hill first published the results of several studies on smoking tobacco. The results linked tobacco smoking with lung cancer. Their cautious conclusion, that smoking is an important factor in the rapid growth of cancer cells has been confirmed by thousands of other studies which have also established connections between smoking and heart disease, bronchitis, and many other diseases and medical conditions. The widespread availability of this extremely harmful drug has brought difficult questions about the duties of not only manufacturers, but also the government to protect consumers from harmful legal products (Hilton n. pag.). Other studies performed also noted a higher risk for consumers of second-hand smoke than smokers themselves. Due to this shocking evidence, the law making bodies of this government have been faced with a difficult decision: should cigarette smoking be legal in public establishments? Because of the health risks of smoking and the success of regulation, the government should place a permanent ban on smoking tobacco in public places. The health risks with cigarette smoking are not limited to smokers: exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) signi
Tobacco smoke contains thousands of chemical agents, including sixty substances that are known to cause cancer (carcinogens). During smoking, nicotine is absorbed quickly into the bloodstream and travels to the brain, causing an addictive effect. The Surgeon General Reports noted the following conclusions about nicotine: cigarettes and other forms of tobacco are addicting, and the aspects that determine tobacco addiction are similar to those that determine heroin and cocaine addiction (Waltman, n. pag.) . ficantly increases a nonsmoker's risk of developing lung cancer. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a risk assessment report in December 1992 in which ETS was classified as a Group A carcinogen (Harrison 23). This category is reserved for only the most dangerous cancer-causing agents. The EPA report estimates that ETS is responsible for lung cancers in several thousand nonsmokers each year, and ETS exposure is also linked to severe respiratory problems in infants and young children. The risk of developing lung and other smoking-associated cancers, as well as non-cancerous diseases, is related to total lifetime exposure to cigarette smoke. This includes the number of cigarettes a person smokes each day, the age at which smoking began, the number of years a person has smoked, and ETS exposure (American Lung Association n. pag.) . Because of the extensive research findings, many states have already implemented a state-wide ban on public smoking. In the United States, many states such as California and Ohio have adopted this policy.
Some topics in this essay:
Bradford Hill,
Lung Association,
California University,
Agency EPA,
Protection Agency,
Morris International,
Surgeon Reports,
Johnson Foundation,
Smoking Health,
California Ohio,
hand smoke,
lung cancer,
risk developing lung,
ban smoking,
risk developing,
cause cancer,
exposed hand,
developing lung,
health risks,
ets exposure,
heart disease,
exposed hand smoke,
exposure cigarette smoke,
includes cigarettes person,
cigarette smoke includes,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1062
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The Right To Choose
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|
Example Essays Home
