Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

The Right To Share Music Over The Internet

Lately, everyone has been talking about Napster, a computer program that allows people to share their music over the Internet. Amazingly, people can now download music that they have always wanted right at their fingertips. Shawn Fanning created this revolutionary, yet, simple idea that incorporates the inconvenience of a search engine with a file-sharing system database. However, this simple idea has stirred up a heated legal battle. An alliance of record companies sued Napster on the grounds of copyright infringement. These record companies believe that “Napster is thus enabling and encouraging the illegal copying and distribution of copyrighted music”(RIAA-recording industry of America). These very powerful and rich record companies want the control and power of the distribution of music amongst the general public. This power and control of music should not be in the hands of a small, elite group of selfish and rich record companies. The general public should have the power and control of the distribution of music.

No one thought that someone like Shawn Fanning could harness the power of the Internet into a simple, yet effective program that could link millions of people together. Fanning got the idea of Napster


from his friends complaining how hard it is to get music on the Internet because any links that were on websites were just dead ends (Taro). Ever since music has been recorded, people have shared their music with other people. In the 1980s, tapes were recorded and shared among people. It was perfectly legal to buy a tape from a record company, and then produce a copy of it and share it amongst friends. Today, there is a new a way to share music. Engineering firm Fraunhofer IIS in 1987 developed computer files called MP3s, short for ISO-MPEG Audio Layer-3. These files are much smaller than standard files from a music CD. Because of their small size, MP3s can be easily transferred over the Internet from one computer to another. Instead of tapes being copied and shared, MP3s are now copied and shared. Because of the invention of MP3s, music is copied and shared on a much grander scale than tapes, because the Internet allows millions of people to share their music. MP3s, at first, were available on unstable servers that were neither efficient nor fast. In the early 1990s, because of their fast Internet connections, college students were the only people able to download MP3s from web-based servers. In creating Napster, Shawn Fanning implemented a new form of sharing called peer-to-peer sharing, otherwise known as P2P. This kind of sharing eliminates the middleman between computer users, and it allows for a direct connection between people sharing their music (Taro-2). As a result, Fanning not only changed, but also revolutionized the music industry. People now have the greatest access to music than ever. People are entitled to share their music over the Internet, and they should be allowed to share their music with other computer users. Music is like any other form of information that is shared over the Internet. Therefore, people have the right to share their music.

In response to the RIAA’s claim that Napster, and other search engines, that sharing music over the Internet hinders music sales and advertisement of artists. But in actuality, music sales have increased significantly because of Napster. Therefore, the RIAA cannot condemn Napster for stealing music away from the sales of the artists. In addition to increasing music sales, Napster has also provided advertisement for music artists, because people preview songs from other people via

Some topics in this essay:
Shawn Fanning, Napster RIAA, Recording Act, Rosen RIAA, Audio Layer-3, It’s Control, Unfortunately RIAA, Internet Napster, Internet RIAA, RIAA Napster, music internet, share music, sharing music, recording industry, music sales, people share, distribution music, sharing music internet, control distribution, control music, control distribution music, people share music, shawn fanning, people sharing music, recording act 1992,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1606
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on The Right To Share Music Over The Internet


Professional Papers:
Downloading Music ampamp Copyright Protection1577 words
Technology Music Consumption3198 words
The music publishing business3005 words
Internet Censorship3849 words
Digital Civil Rights1503 words
Commerce on the Internet2695 words



Student Written Papers:
Napster: Piracy or Public Right1282 words
Copyright Infringement2145 words
Music Piracy2046 words
Mp31391 words
Music Piracy2448 words

Look at even more essays on The Right To Share Music Over The Internet
More Technology Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers