towards women in her story, A Jury of Her Peers. The men don’t understand women enough to ask the ladies to help them to uncover where a women might conceal her murder evidence, and it seemed the men were searching in all the wrong places for evidence. According to the story, Mrs. Hale somewhat knew Minnie Foster, and Mrs. Peter and Mrs. Hale both know how a women moves around the house. The men looked throughout the Wright’s property to uncover there was not much evidence at all, and the women, who are worrying about trifles and how Minnie Foster must have been so lonely, uncover all the superior evidence. At this point the women should be more concerned with bigger things than trifles, because Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters uncovered enough evidence to prove that Minnie foster may be the murderer.

It’s imperative to for women to focus on issues greater than trifles, because they could have a grater impact on the Wright’s investigation.

Mrs. Hale felt much pity for Minnie Foster, because she used to have much town popularity. For example Mrs. Peters stated “The law has got to punish crime. Mrs. Hale,” and Mrs. Hale replies, “I wish you’d seen Minnie Foster.”(Glaspell Pg. 74) Mrs. Hale didn’t care whether or not she did murder her husband, but Mrs. Peters, being the sheriff’s wife, probably felt like she had more responsibility and authority, and had second thoughts about concealing the bird from the men. At this point in the story both the women unquestionably knew that the once happy Minnie Foster turned sour and hung her annoying husband. They discovered a bird cage that had been abused and tampered with that certainly stirred Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters o thinking why had Minnie gotten so destructive with the bird cage.. Mrs. Hale knew that there was a man that came through town a while back selling canaries, but since then no birds of any sort were being sold in there town. At this point in time the ladies were curious to find out what had happened to the missing bird. Then when the ladies were gathering up Minnie’s items that she had requested to have brought to her down at the police station, they were rummaging through her sewing belongings thinking she might enjoy sewing why she is detained; they found the dead bird that belonged to the cage. It was wrapped up in a cloth, and it had cuts all the way around its neck. The bird had looked as it had been hung like Mr. Wright. Evidence that was so relevant to the case should have been turned into their husbands, because the bird had obviously belonged to Minnie, and it was obvious that the bird, which had a neck that had been wrung by someone else, did not die of natural causes. Then there was Mr. Wright who obviously did not died of natural causes seemed to have experienced the same death as the canary. Who else could have possibly killed the bird and Mr. Wright besides Mrs. Wright?

n’s place is in the home, and that issues of concern should be

Some topics in this essay:
Hale Peters, Minnie Foster, Wright Evidence, Foster”Glaspell Pg, Jury Peers, Susie Riveter, Peter Hale, , Susan Glaspell, hale peters, Hale” Hale, minnie foster, dead bird, bird cage, evidence women, bird cage hale, peters uncovered, foster murderer, worrying trifles, murder husband, guilty hale, minnie foster murderer, hale peters uncovered,