A proverb “Grasp all, lose all” seems to have some profundity in the feverish talks that has been heatedly going on around the globe. Between wavering decisions of development and environment, the humanities have made feverish efforts to keep both of the crucial assets in a complete balance. Yet, launching out the commitments of sustaining the two was nearly impossible. Lingering questions of the Earth Summit, held shortly after the end of the Cold War in Rio, June 1992, still persist as a result of discord and reluctance among nations. It now seems that people are expecting much from what will be the outcome of the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa in September this year. An establishment of an ultimate breakthrough, which will provide specific measures such as clear goals and timetables, is crucial according to many. Recent efforts have been conspicuously dominated by an economic development. A good number of people agreed to the fact that globalization and free market system help the establishment of a better environment. I personally agree to this opinion not only because the economic growth helps fight against poverty and ignorance, b

Some topics in this essay:
Pires Corbyn, Los Angeles, Africa September, David Hunter, West India, Weather Action, Act Development’, William Blake, economic development, Rio June, free trade, third world, globalization economic development, globalization economic, Earth Summit, developed countries, world countries, third world countries, “sustainable development”, economic proliferation, economic development launched, industrialized world, context globalization economic, interdependency nations, development free trade,