Piaget and Vygotsky
Children’s’ views and primitive laws for their interpretation of nature is sometimes fascinating and/or appalling. It may seem funny to adults when children think that the moon and the sun follow people around, things disappear when they are out of sight, or the notion that anything big will sink. Piaget found the secrets of human learning and knowledge hidden behind these cute and seemingly unreasonable thinking of children. For example, Piaget asked children questions, like how clouds move. “Adult: What makes clouds move? Child: When we move along they move along too. Adult: Can you make them move? Child: Yes. Adult: When I walk and you are still, do they move? Child: Yes.” (308, McGraw/Hill). With his questioning, Piaget found, basically, that children do not think like grownups. Piaget recognized that this child's beliefs, while not correct by any adult criteria, are not “incorrect” either. His/her ideas are entirely sensible within the framework of the child's way of knowing. Classifying them as “true” or “false” misses the point and shows a lack of respect for the child. What Piaget was after was a theory that could find, like in the cloud dialogue reason, creat
Because Vygotsky's focus was on cognitive development, it is interesting to compare his views with those of Piaget. For Piaget, individuals construct knowledge through their actions on the world. By contrast, the Vygotskian claim is said to be that understanding is social in root. In contrast to Piaget, Vygotsky believed that instruction precedes development. Instruction leads the student into Vygotsky’s “zone of proximal development.” Piaget believed that development precedes learning from the individual to the social world. Egocentric speech, “the ability to understand others’ perspectives” (325, McGraw-Hill), suggests that the child is self-centered and unable to consider the point of view of others. On the other hand, Vygotsky believed that development begins at the social level and moves towards individualism. Egocentric speech is seen as a transition between the child's learning language in a social context, and attempting to internalize it as “inner speech,” or thoughts. For Vygotsky, learning precedes development. In conclusion, both have very different viewpoints on egocentric speech in young children. Despite these differences, both Vygotsky’s and Piaget’s theories of cognitive development “address the issue of how social interaction helps children make cognitive progress” (101, McGraw-Hill). Both agree that development may be initiated by cognitive conflict. Like Piaget, Vygotsky believed that children's egocentric speech was an important part of their cognitive development. However, the two differed in how they viewed the purpose of egocentric speech. They both believed in the development of the child through stages and they both examined the development of knowledge in humans. Their opinions di
Some topics in this essay:
Applying Piaget's,
Piaget Vygotsky,
Child Yes”,
,
Teachers Piaget’s,
Vygotsky’s Piaget’s,
Piaget Piaget,
cognitive development,
egocentric speech,
social interaction,
Yes Adult,
vygotsky believed,
piaget vygotsky,
stages cognitive,
proximal development”,
move child,
piaget’s theory,
“zone proximal,
“zone proximal development”,
stages cognitive development,
piaget vygotsky believed,
development precedes learning,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1184
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Piaget and Vygotsky Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|