Pornography: A Woman’s Right To Her Body
In 1920 women fought for their right to be women, to have their sexuality recognized, and were granted the right to vote nationwide in the nineteenth amendment to the US Constitution. The old trademark saying of feminists, “a woman’s body, a woman’s right,” has come a long way and staked much claim and recognition in this patriarchal society. Though now a new obstacle comes to the table for debate, pornography, which has radical feminists allying with their previous enemies, conservatives and the patriarchal state. Should the state censor pornography? Should they have that right? In the US Constitution it clearly states in the first amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech.” Pornography is a women’s right, which exercises control of their own bodies and freedom of expression and speech. Furthermore, despite controversy, porn is not synonymous with sexual violence towards women, but instead provides society an open field to understand our sexuality and desires openly. Pornography has numerous meanings in today’s society, though it is defined by Webster Dictionary as “the depiction of erotic behavior
Pornography could even let out some of the tensions which leads to sexual violence. Not only does it provide sexual understanding about our human natures of sexual desires, it makes sex more open to talk about. We are exposed to sexuality, and not kept in the dark about our sexual needs. Sexual desires are obviously common human nature, as sex is obviously a part of human life. Lisa Duggan, a radical feminist states, Throughout the last decade the heated topic of pornography has been debated back and forth. Current federal law does not censor pornography from adults and does not neglect the consent women give to work in the porn industry. This is because ultimately, women should and will be the controller of their own bodies. They have the freedom of expression and the 1st amendment on their side. Society needs to be educated that pornography and sexual violence does not equate to a cause and effect relationship. Pornography like other controversial issues provide for conversation. This conversation is what will facilitate an understanding between the people and ourselves. Pornography is not a crime and all the intangible evils accused of it, but instead it is an aspect of our sexual expression that is protected by the principles of our constitution. What happened to, “a woman’s body, a woman’s right,” the recognizing of a woman’s control of her own body, which feminists have fought for over the past centuries (i.e. 1920, Universal Suffrage granted in the US). These arguments basically say that even written consent of adult women on a formal contract with witnesses, is not enough consent a woman can give to use her own body as she desires. What if we didn’t even recognize such extensive consent for two persons to engage in sex? That would be preposterous. Ordinances like the one passed in Minneapolis treat women like children. Children are protected from pornogr
Some topics in this essay:
Universal Suffrage,
Defending Pornography,
,
Lisa Duggan,
Americans Germany,
Webster Dictionary,
Wendy McElroy,
Ordinance MacKinnon,
Dworkin MacKinnon,
sexual violence,
Department Justice,
own bodies,
own body,
freedom expression,
porn industry,
women porn industry,
radical feminist,
women porn,
woman’s body woman’s,
woman’s right”,
body woman’s,
body woman’s right”,
censor pornography,
leads sexual violence,
own bodies freedom,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1274
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
