I found one very developed group that has a goal and a very practical plan to change the legal age to 18. RALLY, which stands for Realistic Alcohol Laws for Legal Youth, knows that underage drinking is a problem and wants to see changes made to give 18 to 20 year-old adults their deserved rights. RALLY is designed for college students, by the college student and because of that system their ideas are the easiest to understand and live by.

If you look around at college parties it seems as if everyone is drinking. Actually you are probably right, but over half of those people drinking are also under the legal drinking age. Drinking is one of the m

In agreement with all of these people and groups are the underage students of these universities that feel rejected because they can not participate in what the rest of the older students on the campus are doing to enjoy themselves. There are also a few groups that are strongly opposed to lowering the drinking age such as Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety and Mothers Against Drunk Driving (Advocates). Virginia Attorney General Richard Cullen posses a good argument that if the drinking age is lowered then it would be easier for people to obtain fake ID’s if they only had to look like they were 18 years of age (Hochberg). Another bad idea for lowering the drinking age is because you may now start to get kids at the ages of 14 and 15 asking 18 year olds to purchase them alcohol so they can have a ‘good time’. There are many other reasons as to why lowering the legal drinking age is being considered other then that students between the age of 18 and 20 on college campuses want the privilege to drink. More serious cases such as that of Mr. Cureton, an 18-year-old freshman at the University of North Carolina whom was arrested for driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.14. Mr. Cureton was almost double the legal limit, 0.08 percent, serving as a major hazard to other drivers on the road at the same time (Wald). If students are afraid of calling home for a ride they may try to drive themselves, resulting in more damage then they may realize at the time. But if the drinking age was lowered then they student would not get into legal trouble for calling a parent or another adult for a ride home.

All of these reasons add to the argument of the people and organizations that believe that lowering the drinking age is a good idea. Sheila Ahern is a journalism junior at Marquette University that recently turned 21 and wrote about her college experiences and view in the Tribune, the Marquette University newspaper. Ahern argues that college students are adults that are living away from parents for the first time in their lives and if they are told not to do something, that is exactly what they are going to do. Students at colleges are divided into two very distinct groups The Legal Drinkers and The Non-Legal Drinkers. If the legal drinking age were to be returned to the age of 18 then the non-legal drinkers would be able to get away from the fraternity houses and start hanging out with the legal drinkers at the local bars.

ain forms of entertainment for the typical college student. The only problem with drinking being the mai

Some topics in this essay:
Richard Cullen, Legal Youth, North Carolina, Sam Pierron, Underage Drinking, Bill Jordan, Kansas University, Brewing Company, Non-Legal Drinkers, Marquette University, drinking age, lowering drinking, lowering drinking age, age 18, drinking age lowered, legal drinking, underage drinking, legal drinking age, age lowered, 18 20, law changed, lowering legal, north carolina, law age 18, believe lowering drinking,