Brita Case
The Brita Products Company began in 1988 under the recommendation of Charlie Couric, a marketing executive with the Clorox Company. Optimistic of its capability to be profitable, Clorox acquired the right to market the home water filtration system. Clorox, citing the overriding long-term benefits of continuous filter sales, initially engaged in deficit spending. Such measures paid off and Clorox not only created a $350 million dollar market, but also captured 70% of the market revenue. Brita’s competitors were unable to effectively rival Brita in pitcher sales. Brita dominated despite many new entrants to the market. However, a small competitor, PUR, launched a different water filtration product. PUR’s faucet-filter system offered added health and convenience benefits that Brita’s pitcher couldn’t provide. With its sales slowing down and its stock price plummeting, Brita needed to make a decision on the future direction of the company. They had three feasible alternatives: i. Continue to emphasize water pitchers ii. Shift emphasis to increase filter sales versus pitchers iii. Begin endorsing a faucet-mounted system It is recommended that the brand should begin endorsing a faucet-mounte
ÿ Deficient attention paid to health concerns/benefits Brita has enjoyed success in the market by creating a perception of better tasting water. However, as water purification technology improves and consumer awareness increases, taste alone is no longer enough to sustain its massive market share. Consumers are demanding more in terms of health benefits and Brita needs to respond to their growing needs and wants. Rather than disregard PUR as a debt-ridden company, Brita should seize the opportunity to challenge PUR before it is too late. Brita needs to capitalize on this opportunity to gain new consumers while their name still remains synonymous with quality and taste. Brita has unmatched brand reputation and recognition in the home water purification industry. Using the Brita name will allow the company to more easily penetrate the market and increases the likelihood of success. Even with the additional costs of having to pay royalties, the benefits outweigh the costs. By increasing the sales price of each unit, Brita can absorb the costs of the royalties. The Market Simulation Study found the price impact created no real significance between the price of 34.99 and 39.99. Thus, a 3% price increase should not greatly affect consumer demand. ÿ Expand product line to meet a broader range of customers/ avoid stagnation
Some topics in this essay:
Recommendation Brita’s,
Products Company,
Company Optimistic,
Simulation Study,
Cons Brita,
PUR Faucet-mounted,
Pros Brita,
Internal Strengths,
PUR KEY,
External Opportunities,
health benefits,
faucet-mounted system,
filter sales,
pitcher sales,
brita pitcher,
endorsing faucet-mounted system,
endorsing faucet-mounted,
faucet filters,
using brita,
water filtration,
sales account,
brita products company,
increase filter sales,
begin endorsing faucet-mounted,
emphasis increase filter,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1743
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
CUSTOMER SERVICES
| |
|