How Accurate Are Eyewitnesses
The experiment, Be a Juror was studied to explore the importance of eyewitness testimonies in a jury trial. This study looks at both a jury’s behavior and an eyewitness’s testimony in a mock trial. The focus is mainly on assessing the reliability of eyewitness identifications. For this experiment, Be a Juror there was a total of seventy-five participants. There were a total of sixty-six female participants and nine male participants. All of the participants in this study ages averaged 22 years old. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three possible conditions. The conditions consisted of the no eyewitness, discredited eyewitness, or refuted eyewitness. Twenty-nine participants were exposed to the no eyewitness condition. This experiment was to measure participant’s degree of perceived guilt in one of the three conditions. Based on previous research in eyewitness testimonies it is hypothesized that the presence of an eyewitness testimony increases the belief of guilt, regardless of the witness’s credibility. Research dealing with eyewitness testimony and related issues have been going on for decades. To this date there continues to be some debate as to the accurac
The independent variable in this experiment was the three conditions that each participant could be exposed to, which were: no eyewitness to crime, credible eyewitness, or discredited eyewitness. The dependent variable in this experiment consisted of the seven-point Likert Scale participants rated their built belief on, where 1 = absolute assurance of no guilt, 4 = confusion of guilt, and 7 = absolute assurance of guilt.. From researching other studies concerning eyewitness testimony and its relationship to the jury’s decision it is concluded that when there is an eyewitness the jury is more willing to return a guilty verdict. Eyewitness studies have been researched using many different vehicles, from Laboratory research to archival studies. A computer simulation is an adequate way of conducting this research for in other studies researchers have used videotapes and archived information to carry out this study. It is important to replica this study for eyewitness testimonies can determine either people’s freedom or their incarceration. It is key to ensure that various angles are studied, so that there can be a better understanding of eyewitness testimonies and their relationship to a jury’s decision. In light of previous research conducted on this subject matter, it is hypothesized that the presence of an eyewitness will increase the belief of guilt whether the witness is credible or not. It is further hypothesized that the “No Eyewitness” category would have the least belief in guilt’ the “Discredited Eyewitness” would have moderate belief in guilt, and the “Unrefuted Eyewitness” would have the highest belief in guilt.
Some topics in this essay:
Roper Shewan,
Loftus Palmer,
Macromedia Player,
Likert Scale,
Introduction Research,
,
Juror Study,
Temple University,
eyewitness testimonies,
eyewitness testimony,
eyewitness condition,
et al,
discredited eyewitness,
participants study,
belief guilt,
voted guilty,
law enforcement,
Method Participants,
law enforcement agents,
results study,
loftus palmer 1974,
eyewitness discredited eyewitness,
discredited eyewitness condition,
durham et al,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2992
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on How Accurate Are Eyewitnesses Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|