No results matched every word — showing papers matching any of them.
... a dramatic, public spectacle of official, violent homicide that teaches the permissibility of killing people to solve social problems. In today's world, governments have too often attempted to justify their lethal fury by the benefits such as an eye for an eye. The bloodshed is real no matter how you look at it, and the death penalty is a deeply cruel method to ... ...
... of official homicide, and one that endorses killing to solve social problems - the worst possible example to set for the citizenry. Governments worldwide have often attempted to justify their lethal fury by extolling the purported benefits that such killing would bring to the rest of society. The benefits of capital punishment are illusory, but the bloodshed and the resulting destruction of ... ...
... a dramatic, public spectacle of official, violent homicide that teaches the permissibility of killing people to solve social problems. In this century, governments have too often attempted to justify their lethal fury by the benefits such killing would bring to the rest of society. The bloodshed is real and deeply destructive of the common decency of the community; the benefits are illusory ... ...
... of official homicide, and one that endorses killing to solve social problems - the worst possible example to set for the citizenry. Governments worldwide have often attempted to justify their lethal fury by extolling the purported benefits that such killing would bring to the rest of society. The benefits of capital punishment are illusory, but the bloodshed and the resulting destruction of ... ...
... a dramatic, public spectacle of official, violent homicide that teaches the permissibility of killing people to solve social problems. In today's world, governments have too often attempted to justify their lethal fury by the benefits such as an eye for an eye. The bloodshed is real no matter how you look at it, and the death penalty is a deeply cruel method to ... ...
