No results matched every word — showing papers matching any of them.
... impacting the lives of those within it. It seems highly implausible to opt for a framework of morality that does not allow for moral development or moral decline, because if by definition, being moral is something we ought to do, and then it could be argued that it follows we ought to optimise our actions by being moral. Cultural relativism does not ... ...
... profit and only the minority of customers were forced to watch a less popular movie so it is evident that the greatest number were afforded the greatest happiness. Whilst pondering the definition of "evil" we must also consider the theory of ethical relativism which proposes that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture and there is no universal truth for ... ...
... these two articles disagree sharply about both the moral acceptability and the desirable legal status of active euthanasia. However, their most fundamental level of disagreement is at the level of definition. James Callahan insists that there is a fundamentally meaningful distinction between "killing- and "letting die,"" and James Rachels believes that this distinction is arbitrary, irrelevant, and morally insignificant ... ...
