1. Ascroft V. ACLU
... 's definition of obscenity, would not restrict the wide range material Web in the way the Communications Decency Act had. In drawing up COPA, Congress used Miller v. California as a basis to define material harmful to minor as: Any communication, picture, image, graphic image file, article, recording, writing, or other matter of any kind that is obscene or that " (A) The average person ... , Thomas believes it does not pose a constitutional problem. "We do not express any view as to whether COPA suffers from substantial overbreadth for other reasons, whether the statute is unconstitutiona...
- Word Count: 2266
- Approx Pages: 9
- Has Bibliography
- Grade Level: Undergraduate