1. Land and the Law of Adverse Possession
... the state? The State did not interfere. The Limitation Act is a private law to govern individual life. Is adverse possession justified on the grounds of 'general interest'? Adverse possession is justified in order to regulate the land. The Chambers considered that their loss of property amounted to a 'deprivation of possession' by contrast the Grand Chambers held that the case was one of 'control of use' by the state. Noted that the adverse possession of ... Hamlets LBC v Barrett, Neuberger LJ suggested obiter that Beaulane was a well-reasoned decision. Nicholas Strauss h...
- Word Count: 2870
- Approx Pages: 11
- Grade Level: Undergraduate